Wellspring Counselling
Relationship Check‑In

Saved.

How this relationship check-in works

This tool is designed as a calm, structured weekly check-in you can do in about 10 to 25 minutes. The goal is to move from reactive conversations to intentional conversations: “Here’s what matters, here’s what I need, and here’s what we can try next.” Many evidence-based couple interventions and relationship education programs use a similar idea: set a shared frame, practice skills, and make small plans you can actually follow through on.12

You will work through the same steps each week. That repetition is a feature, not a bug. When the format stays steady, your nervous systems do not have to guess what is coming next. That makes it easier to listen, stay kind, and problem-solve as a team.1

Helpful defaults

  • Pick a low-stress time (not late at night, not mid-argument).
  • Use a timer: 1 to 2 minutes each for quick sections, 5 to 8 minutes for the main topic.
  • Take turns: one person speaks while the other focuses on understanding, then switch.
  • If it escalates, pause for 10 minutes and come back, or save it for therapy/support.

The flow is inspired by evidence-based couple therapy and relationship education practices, including structured check-ins, appreciation/gratitude, high-quality listening, and small behavioural agreements.12 It is not a substitute for therapy. But it can help you bring more clarity and consistency to the way you stay connected.

Set an intention

A brief intention helps you remember what you are building together, especially when you are stressed or tired. Think of it as choosing the tone and the purpose before you start. In many relationship programs, a shared frame makes it easier to stay collaborative instead of adversarial.12

Keep it short (one sentence)

  • “To feel closer this week.”
  • “To understand each other better.”
  • “To plan support for stress.”
  • “To talk about one thing gently and end feeling like a team.”

Appreciation

Starting with appreciation is not fluff. Research on gratitude in romantic relationships links gratitude with relationship maintenance processes and higher relationship quality, partly because gratitude can promote warmth, responsiveness, and commitment-supporting behaviours.45

A simple appreciation formula

  • What you did: “When you…”
  • Impact: “I felt…”
  • Why it mattered: “because it helped with…”

Example: “When you handled the dishes after my long day, I felt cared for, because it gave me room to decompress.”

Tip: keep appreciations specific, recent, and about effort or care (not global personality labels). One thoughtful, believable sentence lands better than ten generic compliments.4

Connection rating & “what went right”

A quick connection rating helps you name what is true right now without blame. The rating is not a verdict. It is a snapshot that helps you notice patterns over time.

Try this (2 minutes total)

  • Each person: “Right now I feel connected at a ___ out of 10.”
  • Then: “One thing that helped this week was…”
  • Then: “One thing I would love more of next week is…”

Noticing what went right, and responding actively to good news, is associated with relationship well-being. In research on “capitalization,” partners who respond in an enthusiastic, supportive way to each other’s positive events tend to report better relationship outcomes.6

Outside stress & support requests

Stress often spills into couple interactions. Many couple interventions explicitly help partners identify outside stressors and coordinate support, because what looks like “you are mad at me” is sometimes “I am overloaded and running out of capacity.”1

Research on dyadic coping suggests that when partners treat stress as a shared problem and support each other well, couples tend to report better relationship outcomes.9

Make support requests concrete

  • Stressor: “This week my biggest stress is…”
  • Support type: “What would help is (comfort / help / space / problem-solving)…”
  • Specific ask: “Could you do ___ on ___?”
  • Check: “Is that doable for you?”

Needs & clear requests

Feeling understood and responded to is a major pathway to closeness. In relationship science, perceived partner responsiveness (feeling understood, validated, and cared for) is a core ingredient of intimacy and well-being in close relationships.78

High-quality listening plus clear requests make responsiveness easier. When the request is specific, your partner does not have to guess what would help, and you are more likely to feel met.7

A request that is easy to answer

  • Need: “I need more…”
  • Request: “Would you be willing to…”
  • Timeframe: “This week / on weekdays / before bed…”
  • Success looks like: “It would feel good if…”

Example: “I need more decompression time. Would you be willing to handle the first 15 minutes after dinner this week so I can reset?”

Tensions & gentle start-ups

Regular, gentle issue-raising reduces build-up. A structured weekly format (like Gottman’s “State of the Union” meeting) helps couples raise topics more safely, because the conversation has a beginning, a middle, and an end.3

Research on couple interactions also suggests that how conversations start can matter for how they go over time, which is why “gentle start-ups” are emphasized in many practical couple frameworks.17

Rules that keep it gentle

  • One topic (the smallest version you can actually handle today).
  • No mind-reading: stick to what you saw, heard, and felt.
  • No “always / never”: describe the pattern without totalizing.
  • End with a next step, even if it is tiny.

Guided listening & feeling understood

Feeling listened to predicts feeling understood. Guided listening practices help reduce escalation and increase constructive engagement by slowing the conversation down and making understanding the goal of each turn.7

One well-known structure is the speaker–listener technique: one partner speaks briefly while the other reflects back what they heard before responding. This creates a built-in pause for accuracy and emotional safety.10

Micro-script (3 steps)

  1. Speaker: “What I want you to understand is…” (30 to 60 seconds)
  2. Listener: “What I heard is…” + “Did I get it right?”
  3. Speaker: “Yes, and…” or “Almost, it is more like…”

Then switch roles.

Small agreements that actually happen

Smaller, specific agreements are more likely to be followed through on. “If-then” plans (implementation intentions) have strong evidence for improving follow-through in many areas of life, because they tie an action to a clear cue.11

Make your agreement “small enough to succeed”

  • If: “If it is after dinner and the kitchen is messy…”
  • Then: “then I will set a 10-minute timer and do a reset.”
  • Support: “and you will do bedtime during that time.”
  • When we will review: “We will check next week if it helped.”

Treat agreements as experiments. You are not proving who is right. You are testing what helps. If something fails, shrink it or change the cue, rather than turning it into a moral issue.11

A connection ritual

Healthy relationships are not built only by fixing problems. They are built by repeated moments of connection. Research on relationship rituals suggests that meaningful, shared rituals are linked with higher relationship satisfaction and commitment, especially when both partners agree that the ritual “counts” as part of the relationship.1213

Pick one small ritual for this week

  • 10-minute walk after dinner (3 times this week)
  • Phone-free tea or coffee together in the morning (twice)
  • A “goodnight check-in”: one appreciation + one hope for tomorrow (daily)
  • A weekly mini-date at home: same time, same simple plan (weekly)

Closing on purpose

Ending with a takeaway and a hope creates emotional closure and a shared sense of direction. Many evidence-based approaches include some version of “summarize what we learned and choose a next step,” because it helps the conversation land and makes change more likely to show up in real life.12

A simple closing (60 seconds)

  • Takeaway: “One thing I am taking from this is…”
  • Appreciation: “One thing I appreciate about you right now is…”
  • Hope: “One thing I am hopeful about this week is…”

Important safety note

If you feel afraid of your partner, or if there is coercion/control or violence, a self-guided check-in may not be appropriate. Some professional guidance recommends careful screening and safety planning when intimate partner violence is present, and it may not be safe to do couples work in those circumstances.1416

In an emergency call 911 (Canada). If you are in crisis or thinking about suicide, you can call or text 9-8-8 in Canada.15

References

  1. Bradbury, T. N., & Bodenmann, G. (2020). Interventions for Couples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. DOI. PDF
  2. Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2008). Does Marriage and Relationship Education Work? A Meta-Analytic Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. DOI. PDF
  3. Gottman Institute. How to Have a State of the Union Meeting. Article
  4. Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Oveis, C., & Keltner, D. (2012). To Have and to Hold: Gratitude Promotes Relationship Maintenance in Intimate Bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. DOI. PDF
  5. Jin, L., Zhu, T., & Wang, Y. (2024). Relationship power attenuated the effects of gratitude on perceived partner responsiveness and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Scientific Reports. DOI. PDF
  6. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. DOI. PDF
  7. Itzchakov, G., Reis, H. T., & Weinstein, N. (2022). How to foster perceived partner responsiveness: High-quality listening is key. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. DOI. PDF
  8. Reis, H. T., et al. (2018). PPRS: Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (measure description and definition). University of Rochester. PDF
  9. Falconier, M. K., & Kuhn, R. (2020). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical evidence. PLOS ONE. DOI. Full text
  10. Speaker–Listener Technique (reference entry). Springer. PDF
  11. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. DOI. PDF
  12. Garcia-Rada, X., Sezer, O., & Norton, M. I. (2019). Rituals and Nuptials: The Emotional and Relational Consequences of Relationship Rituals. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. DOI. PDF
  13. National Council on Family Relations (NCFR). (2020). Rituals and Couples: Understanding the Role of Rituals in Relationship Processes. PDF
  14. American Psychological Association (APA). Couples therapy and intimate partner violence considerations. PDF
  15. Government of Canada. 9-8-8: Suicide Crisis Helpline (launch information). Page
  16. Government of Canada. Intimate partner violence (information and resources). Page
  17. Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. DOI. PDF

Educational content only, not a substitute for therapy or medical care.
If you need urgent support in Canada, call or text 9-8-8. In an emergency, call 911.

Picture of Alistair Gordon, MA, RCC

Alistair Gordon, MA, RCC

Founder and Clinical Director, Wellspring Counselling & Psychotherapy Inc.
Adjunct Professor of Counselling Psychology, University of British Columbia
Registered Clinical Counsellor (RCC), British Columbia (verify via BCACC)

Alistair reviews Wellspring content for clinical accuracy, trauma-informed language,
and alignment with evidence-informed counselling practice, ensuring information is clear,
compassionate, and appropriate for a general audience.

Alistair Gordon Bio